| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jay Berkenbilt <ejb(at)ql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: psql 7.2.1: \d (alone) missing from \? |
| Date: | 2002-06-28 18:19:16 |
| Message-ID: | 200206281819.g5SIJGG18883@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
>
> This problem is so simple, the subject pretty much says it all. For
> the sake of completeness, I'm running PostgreSQL 7.2.1 as supplied by
> RedHat in their 7.3 release for i386. This bug report pertains only
> to the psql front end.
>
> The command
>
> \d
>
> all by itself (with no arguments) lists all relations along with the
> type and owner. This fact is, however, not mentioned in the help
> message you get with \?, which lists loads of other things you can
> with \d but forgets to mention \d all by itself.
I see it in psql 7.2.1 with \?:
\d [NAME] describe table (or view, index, sequence)
Don't you have that line?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jay Berkenbilt | 2002-06-28 20:16:26 | Re: psql 7.2.1: \d (alone) missing from \? |
| Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2002-06-28 05:40:12 | Re: [ODBC] "Field is too small" |