Re: psql 7.2.1: \d (alone) missing from \?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jay Berkenbilt <ejb(at)ql(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: psql 7.2.1: \d (alone) missing from \?
Date: 2002-06-28 18:19:16
Message-ID: 200206281819.g5SIJGG18883@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
>
> This problem is so simple, the subject pretty much says it all. For
> the sake of completeness, I'm running PostgreSQL 7.2.1 as supplied by
> RedHat in their 7.3 release for i386. This bug report pertains only
> to the psql front end.
>
> The command
>
> \d
>
> all by itself (with no arguments) lists all relations along with the
> type and owner. This fact is, however, not mentioned in the help
> message you get with \?, which lists loads of other things you can
> with \d but forgets to mention \d all by itself.

I see it in psql 7.2.1 with \?:

\d [NAME] describe table (or view, index, sequence)

Don't you have that line?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jay Berkenbilt 2002-06-28 20:16:26 Re: psql 7.2.1: \d (alone) missing from \?
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 2002-06-28 05:40:12 Re: [ODBC] "Field is too small"