| From: | Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Proxy Server ... |
| Date: | 2002-06-25 06:22:46 |
| Message-ID: | 20020624232246.H30655@ninja1.internal |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
> > > does anyone know of a proxy server that i can run on a server to
> > > "pretend" its a postgresql server? so that I can connect to
> > > IP:port and have it establish a connection to IP:5432?
> >
> > [ scratches head ] Why don't you just start the postmaster
> > listening to the other port instead of 5432? Seems like a proxy
> > inside the jail wouldn't really do anything the postmaster itself
> > wouldn't do.
> >
> > Possibly setting VIRTUAL_HOST would help too, if the problem is
> > that the postmaster is trying to bind to addresses it's not
> > allowed to.
>
> Not possible to run a postmaster inside of the jail itself, which
> would *really* simplify things :(
Do you know what part of postgresql doesn't work inside of a jail?
As someone suggested, ipfw fwd _should_ do the trick. I'd be curious
as to why it wouldn't. -sc
--
Sean Chittenden
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Curt Sampson | 2002-06-25 06:29:59 | Re: postgresql to support 50GB of data? |
| Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2002-06-25 06:16:53 | Re: Object Oriented Representation in PostgreSQL |