Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "J(dot) R(dot) Nield" <jrnield(at)usol(dot)com>
Cc: Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net>, Michael Loftis <mloftis(at)wgops(dot)com>, mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE
Date: 2002-06-22 23:17:11
Message-ID: 200206222317.g5MNHBn23427@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

J. R. Nield wrote:
> One other point:
>
> Page pre-image logging is fundamentally the same as what Jim Grey's
> book[1] would call "careful writes". I don't believe they should be in
> the XLOG, because we never need to keep the pre-images after we're sure
> the buffer has made it to the disk. Instead, we should have the buffer
> IO routines implement ping-pong writes of some kind if we want
> protection from partial writes.

Ping-pong writes to where? We have to fsync, and rather than fsync that
area and WAL, we just do WAL. Not sure about a win there.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David M. Kaplan 2002-06-22 23:57:56 ident-des patches
Previous Message Matthew T. O'Connor 2002-06-22 22:32:39 Re: pg_dump and ALTER TABLE / ADD FOREIGN KEY