| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dann Corbit <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>, mloftis(at)wgops(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: What is wrong with hashed index usage? |
| Date: | 2002-06-21 20:31:17 |
| Message-ID: | 200206212031.g5LKVHO16683@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dann Corbit wrote:
> > I was thinking of this during CREATE INDEX ... hash:
> >
> > NOTICE: Hash index use is discouraged. See the CREATE INDEX
> > reference page for more information.
> >
> > Does anyone else like/dislike that?
>
> I think it might be OK temporarily, to show that there is some work that
> needs done. When hashed indexes are fixed, the notice should be
> removed.
Oh, yes, clearly, we would remove it once we had a hash implementation
that had _any_ advantages over btree.
So, is you vote for or against the elog(NOTICE)?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dann Corbit | 2002-06-21 20:34:57 | Re: What is wrong with hashed index usage? |
| Previous Message | Dann Corbit | 2002-06-21 20:20:18 | Re: What is wrong with hashed index usage? |