| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Project scheduling issues (was Re: Per tuple overhead, |
| Date: | 2002-06-11 09:36:34 |
| Message-ID: | 20020611063308.P11817-100000@mail1.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > 2. Once Branch created, any *partially implemented* features will get
> > rip'd out of the -STABLE branch and only fixes to the existing, fully
> > implement features will go in
>
> Now, that is an interesting idea.
Ya, I thought it was when you -and- Tom proposed it :)
I quote from a message on June 8th:
=======================
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > So, I we should:
> > Warn people in July that beta is September 1 and all features
> > have to be complete by then, or they get ripped out.
>
> I thought that was more or less the same thing I was proposing...
========================
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-06-11 09:56:51 | Re: Project scheduling issues (was Re: Per tuple overhead, |
| Previous Message | Karel Zak | 2002-06-11 09:31:49 | Re: Timestamp/Interval proposals: Part 2 |