Re: Project scheduling issues (was Re: Per tuple overhead,

From: Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Project scheduling issues (was Re: Per tuple overhead,
Date: 2002-06-10 07:35:54
Message-ID: 20020610093554.A23410@zf.jcu.cz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 02:32:22AM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:

> Right now, Sept 1st is the "preferred date to go beta" ... when Sept 1st

I agree with Bruce, Sept 1st is the deadline and right time for all
discussion about shift of this date is Sept 2nd. Not now, else you
never will see end of the cycle :-)

Karel

--
Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
http://home.zf.jcu.cz/~zakkr/

C, PostgreSQL, PHP, WWW, http://docs.linux.cz, http://mape.jcu.cz

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jean-Michel POURE 2002-06-10 07:41:15 Re: How can we help?
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-06-10 06:21:56 Re: revised sample SRF C function; proposed SRF API