Re: Per tuple overhead, cmin, cmax, OID

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Per tuple overhead, cmin, cmax, OID
Date: 2002-06-07 16:18:20
Message-ID: 20020607131631.J27088-100000@mail1.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> I will say that I was disapointed by previous release delays and will be
> more vocal about moving things forward than I have in the past.

I don't know ... I kinda like being able to confidently say to clients
that "the latest release is always the most stable/reliable" and not being
burned by it :) Hell, last release, I started moving to v7.2 on some of
our production servers around beta4 or so, since a) I was confident and b)
I needed some of the features ...

Not many software packages you can say that about anymore, eh?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-06-07 16:27:08 Re: Per tuple overhead, cmin, cmax, OID
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-06-07 16:00:04 Re: Per tuple overhead, cmin, cmax, OID