Re: a vulnerability in PostgreSQL

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: lyeoh(at)pop(dot)jaring(dot)my, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: a vulnerability in PostgreSQL
Date: 2002-06-02 06:23:53
Message-ID: 200206020623.g526NrF14144@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> >I hope you won't make this standard practice. Because there are quite
> >significant differences that make upgrading from 7.1.x to 7.2 troublesome.
> >I can't name them offhand but they've appeared on the list from time to time.
>
> I tend to agree above but am not sure making backport patches are
> core's job. I have been providing patches for PostgreSQL for years in
> Japan, and people there seem to be welcome such kind of
> services. However, supporting previous versions is not a trivial job
> and I don't want core members to spend their valuable time for that
> kind of job, since making backport patches could be done by anyone who
> are familiar with PostgreSQL.

Yes, I know SRA and Red Hat provide extensive backpatches for older
versions; it is a nice value-add for their support customers. Not
sure about other PostgreSQL support companies.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mattew T. O'Connor 2002-06-02 08:12:12 make_ctags problem
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-06-02 06:21:14 Re: a vulnerability in PostgreSQL