Re: [HACKERS] Re : Solaris Performance - 64 bit puzzle

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re : Solaris Performance - 64 bit puzzle
Date: 2002-05-29 00:37:09
Message-ID: 200205290037.g4T0b9Q23535@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 09:00:43PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > TODO updated:
> >
> > Add BSD-licensed qsort() for 32-bit Solaris
>
> I've received an email noting that someone else ran a test program
> with the 64 bit library, and had just as bad performance as the 32
> bit one. I haven't had a chance to look at it yet, but it suggests
> that the result is still inconclusive. Maybe, if just one more fire
> goes out here, I can look at it this week.

TODO reverted to be:

Add BSD-licensed qsort() for Solaris

My guess is that your test case didn't tickle the bug.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-05-29 01:41:19 Re: Just PR (was: Stability, PR)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-05-29 00:35:52 Re: [HACKERS] Re : Solaris Performance - 64 bit puzzle

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-05-29 00:48:59 Re: Replication status
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-05-29 00:35:52 Re: [HACKERS] Re : Solaris Performance - 64 bit puzzle