Re: [HACKERS] Re : Solaris Performance - 64 bit puzzle

From: Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re : Solaris Performance - 64 bit puzzle
Date: 2002-05-28 01:17:31
Message-ID: 20020527211731.1da84dae.nconway@klamath.dyndns.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 27 May 2002 21:00:43 -0400 (EDT)
"Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> TODO updated:
>
> Add BSD-licensed qsort() for 32-bit Solaris

Is this necessary? Didn't someone say that Sun had acknowledged the
performance problem and were going to be releasing a patch for it?
If that patch exists (or will exist), it would probably be better to
suggest in the docs that users of 32-bit Solaris apply the patch.

Cheers,

Neil

--
Neil Conway <neilconway(at)rogers(dot)com>
PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Robert Norris 2002-05-28 01:43:28 How to cripple a postgres server
Previous Message Mitch Vincent 2002-05-28 01:12:21 Re: is there any backend (server) timeout

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2002-05-28 02:18:17 Re: Redhat 7.3 time manipulation bug
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-05-28 01:16:59 Re: the parsing of parameters