Re: databases and RAID ...

From: Ragnar Kjørstad <postgres(at)ragnark(dot)vestdata(dot)no>
To: Bill Cunningham <billc(at)ballydev(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: databases and RAID ...
Date: 2002-05-26 15:41:34
Message-ID: 20020526174134.D32683@vestdata.no
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On Sun, May 26, 2002 at 08:00:50AM -0700, Bill Cunningham wrote:
> No Raid 10 is Raid 1 + 0 its strong points are faster writes but slower
> reads.

RAID 10 reads will actually be faster than RAID 5, but it will require
more disks. (2n instead of n+1).

--
Ragnar Kjorstad
Big Storage

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-05-26 16:07:20 Re: Problem with ucred.h building 7.2.1
Previous Message lee 2002-05-26 15:15:45 Re: no pg_hba.conf