| From: | Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joel Burton <joel(at)joelburton(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Paul Ramsey <pramsey(at)refractions(dot)net>, mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy |
| Date: | 2002-05-09 17:09:24 |
| Message-ID: | 200205091709.g49H9OW01742@saturn.janwieck.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Joel Burton wrote:
> Certainly, we don't need all of cygwin (eg bison, gcc, perl, et al). We'd
> need the dll, sh, rm, and few other things. I'm not sure if it would need to
> be in the standard cygwin file structure; I know that you can reconfigure
> this when you use cygwin (I used to). In any event, instead of having to
> have a novice pick & guess which of >100 packages they need, we could put
> together the 5 or 6 they need.
Oh, BTW, had anyone luck with loading of user defined C
functions or the PL handlers under CygWin? I remember having
had trouble with that. When the C function uses global
variables in the backend, things get a bit messy.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | mlw | 2002-05-09 17:24:03 | Re: How much work is a native Windows application? |
| Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2002-05-09 17:05:58 | Re: Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy |