From: | Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
Cc: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: How much work is a native Windows application? |
Date: | 2002-05-08 12:15:09 |
Message-ID: | 20020508081509.16063d15.nconway@klamath.dyndns.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 8 May 2002 01:03:37 -0300 (ADT)
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> wrote:
> On Tue, 7 May 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > It'd be worth trying to understand cygwin issues in detail before we
> > sign up to do and support a native Windows port. I understand the
> > user-friendliness objection to cygwin (though one would think proper
> > packaging might largely hide cygwin from naive Windows users). What I
> > don't understand is whether there are any serious performance lossages
> > from it, and if so whether we could work around them.
>
> Actually, there are licensing issues involved ... we could never put a
> 'windows binary' up for anon-ftp, since to distribute it would require the
> cygwin.dll to be distributed, and to do that, there is a licensing cost
Why? Isn't Cyygwin GPL'd? From http://cygwin.com/licensing.html I don't
see anything that would require licensing fees for OSD-compliant software.
Cheers,
Neil
--
Neil Conway <neilconway(at)rogers(dot)com>
PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2002-05-08 12:28:38 | Re: How much work is a native Windows application? |
Previous Message | Tille, Andreas | 2002-05-08 10:42:33 | Re: Cygwin / Debian dpkg / PostgreSQL / KDE2 and 3 |