From: | Jason Tishler <jason(at)tishler(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Barry Pederson <bp(at)barryp(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-cygwin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Cygwin-Postgres-IpcMemoryCreate |
Date: | 2002-04-29 19:27:16 |
Message-ID: | 20020429192716.GK1152@tishler.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-cygwin |
Barry,
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 12:02:04PM -0500, Barry Pederson wrote:
> So if people need another way to reproduce the problem, one way at least
> for me is to create a new database, import a single extremely large
> (100+mb) object, pg_dump it with something like: pg_dump -b -Ft -f
> foo.pgdump.tar mydbname, and then try to restore it with something like:
> pg_restore -Ft -d mydbname foo.pgdump.tar
Thanks for the test case.
> It'll only take one or two tries for the backend to bail out.
So, it doesn't happen every time? Sounds like a timing issue that
triggers the infamous MS Windows "feature" that prevents two processes
from opening the same file.
> So maybe there is something funky going on with link/unlink, and rename
> would be a better choice on cygwin.
Would someone be willing to take the lead of this one and strace or
debug (i.e., via gdb) this problem? If so, I would be willing to take
the results to pgsql-patches or cygwin-developers as appropriate.
Thanks,
Jason
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andy Samuel | 2002-04-30 02:32:39 | Re: accessing a db |
Previous Message | Jason Tishler | 2002-04-29 19:19:57 | Re: plpgsql won't work |