Re: ?Missing '#define FUNC_MAX_ARGS' in pg_config.h.win32?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Chris Ryan <xgbe(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ?Missing '#define FUNC_MAX_ARGS' in pg_config.h.win32?
Date: 2002-04-23 23:46:10
Message-ID: 200204232346.g3NNkAs01514@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Based on this report, I am adding a FUNC_MAX_ARGS define to
src/include/pg_config.h.win32. Certainly if we have INDEX_MAX_KEYS in
there, we should have FUNC_MAX_ARGS too.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Chris Ryan wrote:
> Bruce,
>
> I'm not active on the pgsql lists so I figured I would pass this on to
> you.
>
> We were working on compiling some apps using the libpq interface on
> windows and ran into a problem where FUNC_MAX_ARGS was not defined in
> the src/include/pg_config.h.win32 file. We added the following line to
> the file:
>
> #define FUNC_MAX_ARGS INDEX_MAX_KEYS
>
> After an nmake -f win32.mak cleanl; nmake -f win32.mak everything
> worked fine.
>
> Thanks in advance.
> Chris
>
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

Attachment Content-Type Size
unknown_filename text/plain 532 bytes

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-04-23 23:54:53 Re: What is wrong with hashed index usage?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-04-23 23:30:06 Re: "make report"