Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction

From: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction
Date: 2002-04-23 14:13:29
Message-ID: 200204231413.29282.lamar.owen@wgcr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tuesday 23 April 2002 04:27 pm, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> OK, would people please vote on how to handle SET in an aborted
> transaction? This vote will allow us to resolve the issue and move
> forward if needed.

> at the end, should 'x' equal:

> 1 - All SETs are rolled back in aborted transaction

This seems the correct behavior.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-04-23 14:24:38 Re: cvs update, configure, make, error in bootstrap.* ?...
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-04-23 13:49:30 Re: Generating Huge String?