Re: [PATCHES] [SQL] 16 parameter limit

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)atentus(dot)com>
Cc: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [SQL] 16 parameter limit
Date: 2002-04-16 03:44:16
Message-ID: 200204160344.g3G3iGg04889@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches pgsql-sql

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> (Tom Lane says both SQL92 and SQL99 specify 128 as the maximun
> identifier length)
>
> Anyway, how does one measure the perfomance impact of such a change?
> By merely changing the constant definition, or also by actually using
> long identifiers? I can do that if it's of any help, for various values
> perhaps.

I think I would measure disk size change in a newly created database,
and run regression for various values. That uses a lot of identifier
lookups.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-04-16 03:49:30 Re: [PATCHES] [SQL] 16 parameter limit
Previous Message Neil Conway 2002-04-16 03:42:35 Re: [PATCHES] [SQL] 16 parameter limit

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-04-16 03:49:30 Re: [PATCHES] [SQL] 16 parameter limit
Previous Message Neil Conway 2002-04-16 03:42:35 Re: [PATCHES] [SQL] 16 parameter limit

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-04-16 03:49:30 Re: [PATCHES] [SQL] 16 parameter limit
Previous Message Neil Conway 2002-04-16 03:42:35 Re: [PATCHES] [SQL] 16 parameter limit