| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, John Proctor <jproctor(at)prium(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: [SQL] 16 parameter limit |
| Date: | 2002-04-16 03:18:52 |
| Message-ID: | 200204160318.g3G3IqK02695@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Here is an email I sent to patches, minus the patch. I am sending to
hackers for comments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> The following patch adds --maxindfuncparams to configure to allow you to
> more easily set the maximum number of function parameters and columns
> in an index. (Can someone come up with a better name?)
>
> The patch also removes --def_maxbackends, which Tom reported a few weeks
> ago he wanted to remove. Can people review this? To test it, you have
> to run autoconf.
>
> Are we staying at 16 as the default? I personally think we can
> increase it to 32 with little penalty, and that we should increase
> NAMEDATALEN to 64.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rod Taylor | 2002-04-16 03:19:45 | Re: [PATCHES] [SQL] 16 parameter limit |
| Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2002-04-16 03:18:16 | Re: ANSI Compliant Inserts |