Re: RFC: Generating useful names for foreign keys and checks

Yes! Please do something with those unnamed constraints.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm thinking of doing a patch to generate foo_fkey and foo_chk names for
> fk's and checks. I know that this will make using DROP CONSTRAINT a whole
> heck of a lot easier. There have also been a few people who've complained
> on the list about all the <unnamed> foreign keys, etc.
>
> I know Tom had some fears, but I don't know if they still apply, or if
> they're any worse than the current situation?
>
> Can I go ahead?
>
> Chris
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026