From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Daniel Kalchev <daniel(at)digsys(dot)bg> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_temp.XX.0 |
Date: | 2002-04-03 06:13:01 |
Message-ID: | 200204030613.g336D1P12032@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
You can stop the postmaster and start the postgres binary with the -O
flag and delete the pg_temp tables. We don't have a cleanup for these
failed backends but we should. Normally they are cleaned up.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Daniel Kalchev wrote:
> I found out, that there are some probably temporary relations in one of my
> databases, with names (that show in vacuum verbose output) like
> pg_temp.12720.0.
>
> Are these the result of CREATE TEMP TABLE or simmilar and if so, can such
> relations be safely dropped? Perhaps a good idea to add some vacuum
> functionality to do this.
>
> Daniel
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark kirkwood | 2002-04-03 07:00:06 | Re: Re : Solaris Performance - Profiling (Solved) |
Previous Message | Daniel Kalchev | 2002-04-03 06:09:34 | pg_temp.XX.0 |