Re: status of IPv6 Support for INET/CIDR types

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Reinoud van Leeuwen <reinoud(dot)v(at)n(dot)leeuwen(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: status of IPv6 Support for INET/CIDR types
Date: 2002-04-02 19:59:44
Message-ID: 200204021959.g32JxiM19037@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Reinoud van Leeuwen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are implementing a database for maintaining our IP addresses. Looking
> in the current documentation, it seems that INET/CIDR types only support
> IPv4 addresses until now, although
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2001-09/msg00236.php
> seems to suggest a patch for IPv6 has been ready for some time now.
>
> What is the status of IPv6 types at this moment?

Some merging of code from the BIND code and our IPv4 changes need to be
made. No one has done it yet.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Kalchev 2002-04-02 20:25:15 maxint reached?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-04-02 19:39:08 Re: timeout implementation issues