Re: Fw: Fw: bad performance on irix

From: "Robert E(dot) Bruccoleri" <bruc(at)stone(dot)congenomics(dot)com>
To: Igor(dot)Kovalenko(at)motorola(dot)com (Igor Kovalenko)
Cc: lamigo(at)atc(dot)unican(dot)es, bruc(at)acm(dot)org, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fw: Fw: bad performance on irix
Date: 2002-03-20 21:52:57
Message-ID: 200203202152.QAA30172@stone.congenomics.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dear Igor,

Igor Kovalenko writes:

> Makes me wonder... perhaps now someone will be convinced to take a look
> at the POSIX IPC patch. On some platforms (not on Linux I am afraid)
> POSIX mutexes might be quite a bit faster than SYSV semaphores.

Yes, but on the SGI platform, the MIPS test_and_set instructions are
really fast and should be used.

+-----------------------------+------------------------------------+
| Robert E. Bruccoleri, Ph.D. | email: bruc(at)acm(dot)org |
| P.O. Box 314 | URL: http://www.congen.com/~bruc |
| Pennington, NJ 08534 | |
+-----------------------------+------------------------------------+

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Igor Kovalenko 2002-03-20 22:18:57 Re: Fw: Fw: bad performance on irix
Previous Message Fernando Nasser 2002-03-20 21:45:22 Re: Domains and type coercion