Re: Access to Postgres query problem

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: "Booth, Robert" <Robert_Booth(at)intuit(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Access to Postgres query problem
Date: 2002-03-20 01:05:01
Message-ID: 20020320120501.A502@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 02:59:23PM -0800, Booth, Robert wrote:
> I need to run a query in an Access client to my Postgres backend.
[snip]

> Now to my question. When I do this from within Access it wants to use it's
> own SUM and so it complains about the cast(). How can I either force Access
> into sending the entire query to Postgres and just waiting for the
> resultset, or force Access into performing the multiplication also?

Basically you have to solutions. Change the schema so they are they same
type so the cast is not required. Or use a pass-through query. That's listed
right next to the union query. You can't use the query builder then but
access will send exactly what you type.

What I generally do is use the query builder to build the structure and then
convert to passthrough for final touching up.

> Or my other thought is that I need to build my own operator/function to
> handle the multiplying of double precision and numeric data types. If this
> is what I should do how should I go about it?

You'd have to write you're own function for this, which would slow it down.
Mind you, not really more than what it does with the cast.
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Ignorance continues to thrive when intelligent people choose to do
> nothing. Speaking out against censorship and ignorance is the imperative
> of all intelligent people.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christian Cabanero 2002-03-20 02:06:44 SQL Server performing much better?!?!
Previous Message Carlo Florendo 2002-03-20 00:47:13 Re: Visual display tool?