| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Rod Taylor <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca>, Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: elog() patch |
| Date: | 2002-03-04 03:24:24 |
| Message-ID: | 200203040324.g243OOF14838@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I will add a new symbol INFOFORCE which will always be sent to the
> > client no matter what the client_min_messages level.
>
> I was thinking along the same lines, but I hate that name.
> INFOALWAYS maybe?
Love it. :-) Sounds like a song. Info-always on my mind, ...
> Also, should it be different from INFO as far as the server log
> goes? Not sure.
No, I think we add too much confusion doing that. It should behave like
info to the server or we have to add an additional server_min_messages
level. My feeling is that they would want INFOALWAYS in server logs in
the same cases they would want INFO.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-03-04 03:26:45 | Re: elog() patch |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-03-04 03:22:22 | Re: elog() patch |