Re: eWeek Poll: Which database is most critical to your

From: Denis Perchine <dyp(at)perchine(dot)com>
To: "Henshall, Stuart - WCP" <SHenshall(at)westcountrypublications(dot)co(dot)uk>, 'Neil Conway' <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: eWeek Poll: Which database is most critical to your
Date: 2002-02-28 05:41:03
Message-ID: 20020228021525.1D0C51FEEB@mx.webmailstation.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello,

> If I understand correctly you'll be taking matching the on the original
> query string, then pulling out the previous plan, rather than doing all
> the planning again?

No.

> Or where you thinking of storing the resultant tuples (seems far more
> diffcult to do effciently)?

Yes. They store a result of the query, not the plan. Storing a plan is not
such a win as storing a result of queries returning relativly small amount of
tuples.

--
Denis

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-02-28 05:43:49 Re: elog() patch
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-02-28 05:10:24 elog() patch