Re: atomicity

From: Jean-Michel POURE <jm(dot)poure(at)freesurf(dot)fr>
To: Guru <guru(at)indvalley(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: atomicity
Date: 2002-02-27 16:50:31
Message-ID: 200202271650.g1RGoVLx019262@www1.translationforge
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> ZG> MySQL has a large, well-tested feature set that includes fewer
> ZG> traditional RDBMS features that PostgreSQL. PostgreSQL and MySQL come
> ZG> from very different traditions. PostgreSQL is the heir to quite
> ZG> phenonmenal amounts of academic research work that focused on
> ZG> developing a complete set of RDBMS features. MySQL evolved from a set
> ZG> of working development tools - it was developed with attention to
> ZG> speed, stability and performance at the cost of certain features.

MySQL surely employs a team of communication specialists. This kind of
argument can only be invented by a non-technician, non-programmer, non-RDBMS,
"marketing" someone. All this reminds me of my MBA.

> MySQL AG employs a REAL team of FAKE communication specialists
> whose goal is to sell a FAKE product to a team of FAKE investors,
> who in turn will resell this FAKE company to a team of REAL people
> who in turn will loose their REAL money. And cry...

/JMP

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mitrofanov Maxim 2002-02-27 17:09:41 Can be two different sequences with one name ?
Previous Message Colin Taylor 2002-02-27 16:49:44 Compiling under Solaris 8