| From: | Jean-Michel POURE <jm(dot)poure(at)freesurf(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Guru <guru(at)indvalley(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: atomicity |
| Date: | 2002-02-27 16:50:31 |
| Message-ID: | 200202271650.g1RGoVLx019262@www1.translationforge |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
> ZG> MySQL has a large, well-tested feature set that includes fewer
> ZG> traditional RDBMS features that PostgreSQL. PostgreSQL and MySQL come
> ZG> from very different traditions. PostgreSQL is the heir to quite
> ZG> phenonmenal amounts of academic research work that focused on
> ZG> developing a complete set of RDBMS features. MySQL evolved from a set
> ZG> of working development tools - it was developed with attention to
> ZG> speed, stability and performance at the cost of certain features.
MySQL surely employs a team of communication specialists. This kind of
argument can only be invented by a non-technician, non-programmer, non-RDBMS,
"marketing" someone. All this reminds me of my MBA.
> MySQL AG employs a REAL team of FAKE communication specialists
> whose goal is to sell a FAKE product to a team of FAKE investors,
> who in turn will resell this FAKE company to a team of REAL people
> who in turn will loose their REAL money. And cry...
/JMP
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mitrofanov Maxim | 2002-02-27 17:09:41 | Can be two different sequences with one name ? |
| Previous Message | Colin Taylor | 2002-02-27 16:49:44 | Compiling under Solaris 8 |