Re: Patches split from 7.3 queue

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patches split from 7.3 queue
Date: 2002-02-23 21:26:45
Message-ID: 200202232126.g1NLQkG09195@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > It might be best to bounce all the pending patches back to the
> > submitters, and ask them to resubmit whatever they think is the
> > latest version. Particularly with the jdbc stuff, I think some
> > of that got applied already. Also, for stuff that is already
> > out of date (and some of it is!), it seems better to distribute
> > the update/merge work instead of putting it all on your shoulders.
>
> I will let the jdbc people chew on it. They are very good at
> evaluating the jdbc stuff at this point. Let's see what's left after a
> week. Peter's email to me sliced through a chunk of it already.

Actually, looking over the 48 patches items, 50% are either obviously
trivial or are jdbc patches that the jdbc group will handle. Let me
pair this down. I don't think it is big a deal as people think.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-02-23 21:31:45 Re: pg_ctl - tighten command parameter checking
Previous Message Brent Verner 2002-02-23 21:19:48 Re: Patches split from 7.3 queue