From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Patches split from 7.3 queue |
Date: | 2002-02-23 21:26:45 |
Message-ID: | 200202232126.g1NLQkG09195@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > It might be best to bounce all the pending patches back to the
> > submitters, and ask them to resubmit whatever they think is the
> > latest version. Particularly with the jdbc stuff, I think some
> > of that got applied already. Also, for stuff that is already
> > out of date (and some of it is!), it seems better to distribute
> > the update/merge work instead of putting it all on your shoulders.
>
> I will let the jdbc people chew on it. They are very good at
> evaluating the jdbc stuff at this point. Let's see what's left after a
> week. Peter's email to me sliced through a chunk of it already.
Actually, looking over the 48 patches items, 50% are either obviously
trivial or are jdbc patches that the jdbc group will handle. Let me
pair this down. I don't think it is big a deal as people think.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-02-23 21:31:45 | Re: pg_ctl - tighten command parameter checking |
Previous Message | Brent Verner | 2002-02-23 21:19:48 | Re: Patches split from 7.3 queue |