Re: shared_buffers and effective_cache_size

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Zhang, Anna" <azhang(at)verisign(dot)com>
Cc: "'pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: shared_buffers and effective_cache_size
Date: 2002-02-22 22:45:39
Message-ID: 200202222245.g1MMjdE00288@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Zhang, Anna wrote:
> Hi,
> I just got a new Penguin machine with 2 processors and 2G RAM. After
> installed postgres 7.2, I started to modify postgresql.conf to get max
> performance. I read Adm Guide and Bruce's article: PostgreSQL Hardware
> Performance Tuning, in my understanding, shared_buffers is similar to
> Oracle's db_block_buffers, but also sometimes I feel it sounds like oracle's
> SGA. When I reached effective_cache_size, don't know what's that, docs can't
> help, it seems for optimizer, but how big should I set? no feeling! Does
> anyone can compare this paremeter to oracle's so I can understand better.
>
> If I set SHARED_BUFFERS = 131072, what effective_cache_size should be?

My guess is that effective_cache_size is an estimate of the amount of OS
caching memory available, rather than PostgreSQL shared buffers.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-02-23 00:51:26 Re: Strange locking behaviour
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-02-22 22:39:27 Re: Backup and Recovery (revisited)