Re: elog() proposal

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: elog() proposal
Date: 2002-02-22 03:54:18
Message-ID: 200202220354.g1M3sIP13144@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > OK, let me throw out a modified proposal that attempts to deal with
> > these issues, and avoids creating a complicated error reporting system
> > that few will understand or be able to control.
>
> Question: does any of this help with the problem (I assume it's a problem)
> that a syntax error in a statement causes the transaction to be rolled back?
>
> Very annoying in psql...

No, that is savepoints. I have a proposal on that in TODO.detail but
not sure if it is acceptable or when I can implement it.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-02-22 03:55:55 Re: Array slice subscripts (was Re: [SQL] plpgsql function
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-02-22 03:53:16 Re: elog() proposal