Re: [Fwd: MS SQL compatible functions]

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Medi Montaseri <medi(at)cybershell(dot)com>
Cc: Philip Hallstrom <philip(at)adhesivemedia(dot)com>, Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Ian Harding <ianh(at)tpchd(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, dean(at)tmdt(dot)com(dot)tw
Subject: Re: [Fwd: MS SQL compatible functions]
Date: 2002-02-07 03:06:36
Message-ID: 200202070306.g1736ag01486@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

> Or it lacks priority.....on another thread a caller is asking for Distributed
> PG
> so he can install 20 linux boxes instead of an IBM 390 or Sun E10k
>
> PG and Ingress have always been more popular in the academic world, why
> not channel our energy in that area. Just imagine, a good distributed OS
> (linux),
> a good distributed DB (DPG) and a good distributed HTTP (apache, soap) and
> we have lift off.

No question is is important. It actually isn't the lack of excitement
which is the problem, it is really the lack of challenge and the fact it
is tedious to mimick another database.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Medi Montaseri 2002-02-07 03:54:36 Re: [Fwd: MS SQL compatible functions]
Previous Message Rob Arnold 2002-02-07 03:04:22 Re: PostgreSQL v7.2 Final Release

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-02-07 03:18:20 Suggestions for 7.3 date handling
Previous Message Rob Arnold 2002-02-07 03:04:22 Re: PostgreSQL v7.2 Final Release