| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)krosing(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Syscaches should store negative entries, too |
| Date: | 2002-02-01 22:57:59 |
| Message-ID: | 200202012257.g11MvxG03697@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > Actually, that is not our standard comment. We want to give people a
> > limited set of meaningful options. If then want billions of options,
> > they should use Oracle. :-)
>
> In that case we have to decide for the user for which case we optimize
> and give user suboptimal performanse for the _other_ case.
If we can't decide, and it is significant, we have to give any option,
but only if both are true.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-02-01 23:11:51 | Re: Syscaches should store negative entries, too |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-02-01 22:46:52 | Re: Array aggregation. Was: PostgreSQL Final Release ... Monday? |