Re: RTLD_LAZY considered harmful (Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems)

From: Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RTLD_LAZY considered harmful (Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems)
Date: 2002-01-21 19:04:50
Message-ID: 20020121190450.G4048@quartz.newn.cam.ac.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql

On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 01:40:17PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> cycle, because perhaps some of these platforms don't support the full
> dlopen() API. Comments? Can anyone test whether RTLD_NOW works on
> any of the above-mentioned ports?

Didn't check it *works*, but from $NetBSD: dlfcn.h,v 1.13 2000/06/13 01:21:53

/* Values for dlopen `mode'. */
#define RTLD_LAZY 1
#define RTLD_NOW 2
#define RTLD_GLOBAL 0x100 /* Allow global searches in object */
#define RTLD_LOCAL 0x200
#if !defined(_XOPEN_SOURCE)
#define DL_LAZY RTLD_LAZY /* Compat */
#endif

Cheers,

Patrick

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message mlw 2002-01-21 19:21:28 Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL
Previous Message mlw 2002-01-21 18:59:55 Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephan Szabo 2002-01-21 21:01:59 Re: support for transact-sql?
Previous Message Stephan Szabo 2002-01-21 18:06:00 Re: list triggers ?