Re: "IS NOT NULL" != "NOT NULL"

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>, Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: "IS NOT NULL" != "NOT NULL"
Date: 2002-01-20 00:34:39
Message-ID: 200201200034.g0K0Ydl18925@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> Another problem is that SQL's boolean operations act as though NULL
> is the logical value UNKNOWN, rather than explicitly setting up a
> boolean datatype with the three allowed values TRUE, FALSE, UNKNOWN.
> While the rules for propagation of NULL happen to be similar to the
> results that logic dictates you get for UNKNOWN, this is still a kind
> of type pun, and it doesn't help to reduce the confusion any.

Sorry for not mentioning section, it is Customizing Queries/Using NULL
values. Content on the web:

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/awbook.html

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Cornelia Boenigk 2002-01-20 02:59:42 Re: Long running queries and timeouts
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-01-20 00:32:55 Re: "IS NOT NULL" != "NOT NULL"