Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade
Date: 2002-01-10 18:54:12
Message-ID: 200201101854.g0AIsCu04595@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Also, how do I find the current xlog segment position. Is it one of
> > these fields shown by pg_controldata?
>
> "latest checkpoint location" should do.
>
> BTW, if your script is relying on pg_resetxlog to be available, best to
> ensure that it's there before you do anything irreversible ...

Do we want to remove the 7.1beta WAL format code from
/contrib/pg_resetxlog? Remember, this utility was originally written to
allow for a WAL format change during 7.1beta testing. Seems like dead
code now.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-01-10 19:04:22 Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-01-10 18:16:46 Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-01-10 19:04:22 Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-01-10 18:16:46 Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade