From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | "'Peter Eisentraut'" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Default permissions of system catalogs |
Date: | 2002-01-08 18:58:06 |
Message-ID: | 200201081858.g08Iw6912221@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > Objections?
>
> I assume you are proposing the same privileges that you describe for a user
> table (i.e. by default only the owner (==superuser) has any access)?
>
> If so, this would break pgAdmin for any users who are not the superuser on
> their system as the majority of it's operation relies on examining the
> system catalogues. In this case I would *strongly* object.
>
> <thinks...> Surely this would also be the case for psql though - have I
> misunderstood something?
I assumed he was saying that the contents of pg_class permissions should
be interpreted the same whether it is a system table or not. He would
set the proper system table permissions so they are visible to all users
like it is now.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-01-08 19:10:50 | Strange results with date/interval arithmetic |
Previous Message | Barry Lind | 2002-01-08 18:51:12 | Re: [HACKERS] JDBC: why is PGobject class instead of interface? |