From: | Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | |
Cc: | Daniel Kalchev <daniel(at)digsys(dot)bg>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: again on index usage |
Date: | 2002-01-08 01:53:21 |
Message-ID: | 20020107175321.C67695@ninja1.internal |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> It's difficult to tell from this what it thinks the selectivity of the
> ipdate index would be, since the rows estimate includes the effect of
> the ipaddr and router restrictions. What do you get from just
>
> explain
> SELECT sum(input) FROM iplog_gate200112
> WHERE
> '2001-12-01 00:00:00+02' <= ipdate AND ipdate < '2001-12-02 00:00:00+02' AND
> '2001-12-01 00:00:00+02' <= ipdate AND ipdate < '2002-01-01 00:00:00+02';
>
I don't know if this'd help, but if you're suming the data and running
this query often, see if a function index would help:
CREATE INDEX sum_input_fnc_idx ON iplog_gate200112 (sum(input));
-sc
--
Sean Chittenden
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2002-01-08 02:20:30 | Re: Problem with view and fetch_fields |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-01-08 01:00:52 | Re: ecpg compile error on AIX |