Re: What happend to the Exoffice XA package?

From: Ned Wolpert <wolpert(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: "Kovcs_Pter" <peter(dot)kovacs(at)sysdata(dot)siemens(dot)hu>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: What happend to the Exoffice XA package?
Date: 2002-01-02 17:27:47
Message-ID: 20020102172747.52221.qmail@web13406.mail.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Is the connection susposed to be released in the commit()? I thought
that the application server would release it, and/or place the connection
back in the pool. (I need to look at the spec)

Remember, the pooling side of the XA stuff for postgresql doesn't work
by itself. I know tyrex has its own pooling system, but I had thought
that it required more behavior from the jdbc driver than we had. Can
you create a patch so we can see your changes? I'd like to see what
changes you made.

--- Kovcs_Pter <peter(dot)kovacs(at)sysdata(dot)siemens(dot)hu> wrote:
> The physical connection is not released in XAResourceImpl.commit() after
> a
> successful commit (on the physical connection). This results in a
> constantly
> increasing number of physical connections, even if only one physical
> connection is needed at a time. (A physical connection gets
> recycled/"garbage collected", as the package internal timer for the
> transaction, in which the connection participated, expires.)

=====
Virtually, | "Must you shout too?"
Ned Wolpert | -Dante
wolpert(at)yahoo(dot)com |
_________________/ "Who watches the watchmen?"
4e75 -Juvenal, 120 AD

-- Place your commercial here -- fnord

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
http://greetings.yahoo.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Barry Lind 2002-01-02 17:44:47 Re: What happend to the Exoffice XA package?
Previous Message Kovács Péter 2002-01-02 17:08:02 Re: What happend to the Exoffice XA package?