From: | Ned Wolpert <wolpert(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Kovcs_Pter" <peter(dot)kovacs(at)sysdata(dot)siemens(dot)hu>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: What happend to the Exoffice XA package? |
Date: | 2002-01-02 17:27:47 |
Message-ID: | 20020102172747.52221.qmail@web13406.mail.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Is the connection susposed to be released in the commit()? I thought
that the application server would release it, and/or place the connection
back in the pool. (I need to look at the spec)
Remember, the pooling side of the XA stuff for postgresql doesn't work
by itself. I know tyrex has its own pooling system, but I had thought
that it required more behavior from the jdbc driver than we had. Can
you create a patch so we can see your changes? I'd like to see what
changes you made.
--- Kovcs_Pter <peter(dot)kovacs(at)sysdata(dot)siemens(dot)hu> wrote:
> The physical connection is not released in XAResourceImpl.commit() after
> a
> successful commit (on the physical connection). This results in a
> constantly
> increasing number of physical connections, even if only one physical
> connection is needed at a time. (A physical connection gets
> recycled/"garbage collected", as the package internal timer for the
> transaction, in which the connection participated, expires.)
=====
Virtually, | "Must you shout too?"
Ned Wolpert | -Dante
wolpert(at)yahoo(dot)com |
_________________/ "Who watches the watchmen?"
4e75 -Juvenal, 120 AD
-- Place your commercial here -- fnord
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
http://greetings.yahoo.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Barry Lind | 2002-01-02 17:44:47 | Re: What happend to the Exoffice XA package? |
Previous Message | Kovács Péter | 2002-01-02 17:08:02 | Re: What happend to the Exoffice XA package? |