Re: pg_regress.sh overrides PGPORT

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_regress.sh overrides PGPORT
Date: 2001-12-29 05:22:28
Message-ID: 200112290522.fBT5MS816732@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> > Does anybody know why test/regress/pg_regress.sh overrides --port or
> > PGPORT? It would be nice if we could do two distinct tests at the same
> > time. But pg_regress.sh forces to use port 65432.
>
> Well, it should surely *not* use PGPORT; that's likely to be occupied.
> But a --port switch doesn't seem unreasonable.

Added to TODO:

* Add --port flag to regression tests

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2001-12-29 08:09:39 Re: text -> time cast problem
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-12-29 05:10:12 Re: text -> time cast problem