Re: Status on RC1?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Status on RC1?
Date: 2001-12-21 06:51:39
Message-ID: 200112210651.fBL6pdH10360@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> There is doc/HISTORY, and doc/src/sgml/release.sgml which needs to be
> merged. We *should* be generating doc/HISTORY from the release.sgml
> source, but we apparently have never started doing that. Next release,
> we really should since the sgml docs could and should be the definitive
> source for this kind of information.
>
> For now, someone will need to hand-merge the contents of doc/HISTORY
> back into the sgml source file.

I have indicated the places where things should come from the HISTORY
file to release.sgml. It would be nice to make it automatic. I think
the problem we had was that ASCII output from SGML is kind of hard to
tweek to look good.

Whenever you want to get started, just cut-paste them over. If you can
give me a little warning, I will make sure HISTORY is up to date with
CVS. I know it is pretty close now.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD 2001-12-21 08:20:50 Re: contrib idea
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2001-12-21 06:42:48 Re: Status on RC1?