Re: FreeBSD/alpha

From: David Terrell <dbt(at)meat(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD/alpha
Date: 2001-12-18 19:40:48
Message-ID: 20011218114048.A3857@pianosa.catch22.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 10:27:08AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I generally think it suspicious when one of the BSD ports varies from
> the other two, and here it would seem that it's wrong for freebsd to
> be out of step. I propose making the entry read
>
> float8/i.86-.*-freebsd=float8-small-is-zero
>
> Any comments from freebsd users out there? Are there any other freebsd
> platforms besides i86 and alpha? If so, how do they do on this test?

There is preliminary work on a sparc port but it is not in usable
shape as far as I am aware.

--
David Terrell | "To increase the hype, I'm gonna release a bunch
Nebcorp PM | of BLT variants (NetBLT, FreeBLT, BLT386, etc)
dbt(at)meat(dot)net | and create artificial rivalries."
wwn.nebcorp.com | - Brian Swetland (www.openblt.org)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Doug McNaught 2001-12-18 19:47:37 Re: Concerns about this release
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-12-18 19:36:11 Re: problems with table corruption continued