Re: Licensing

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Doug McNaught <doug(at)wireboard(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Licensing
Date: 2001-12-05 18:48:33
Message-ID: 200112051848.fB5ImXV01284@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I may have some spare hacking time coming up, and I was thinking about
> adding a PL (Scheme) to PostgreSQL. I've found some code out there
> for a small Scheme interpreter, but it appears to be licensed under a
> "BSD with advertising clause" license (as opposed to the "modern BSD"
> license of PostgreSQL). The license text includes:
>
> Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
> notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
>
> Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
> notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in
> the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
> distribution.
>
> Would it be a problem to include this code in PG?

I think it would be fine. I don't think the old/new BSD license is any
major distinction. We moved from old to new with no issues a while ago.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

  • Licensing at 2001-12-05 18:17:39 from Doug McNaught

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ross J. Reedstrom 2001-12-05 18:58:51 Re: Licensing
Previous Message Doug McNaught 2001-12-05 18:17:39 Licensing