Re: RC1 on Monday?

From: Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RC1 on Monday?
Date: 2001-12-04 22:19:00
Message-ID: 200112042219.fB4MJ1f12154@saturn.jw.home
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> > Does anyone have anything outstanding that holds off an RC1?
> > Seen alot of changes over the past week, but mostly in the docs ...
> > haven't seen anything that I think is 'major' that would require a Beta4,
> > anyone else?
>
> The only thing I'm concerned about is Jan's report from Tuesday:
> http://fts.postgresql.org/db/mw/msg.html?mid=1020754
>
> If that's real it seems like a release-stopper; but he hasn't come back
> with any more info, not even enough to let other people try to reproduce
> it.

I was pretty sure that I was awake when I saw it. But I'm not
able to reproduce it any more. So for the moment I take
anything back and claim the opposite.

Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-12-04 22:30:44 Re: text -> time cast problem
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-12-04 22:00:54 Re: text -> time cast problem