> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Are you saying we never need to save deferred trigger events any longer,
> > or just in this case?
> The only reason we save 'em beyond the time they are executed is to support
> "triggered data change" detection.
I assume we still need a queue for deferred triggers, right? We just
now don't need to keep them after that like we used to, right?
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2001-11-13 01:32:51|
|Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE RENAME fix |
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2001-11-13 01:28:54|
|Subject: Re: Possible patch to remove "triggered data change" support |