Re: FW: Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration

Added to TODO:

o Move to using 'make' rather than 'ant'(?)

At least we know it is an issue for final decision.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

-- Start of PGP signed section.
> On 23-Oct-2001 Jayesh K. Parayali wrote:
> > Just a thought. Why not separate postgres and postgres jdbc in that
> > case?
>
> To be honest, this is the one thing I want to avoid if possible. Its important
> that the postgres build system builds the 'official' interfaces as well, since
> it keeps the two connect tightly.
>
> I prefer to use ant to build Java code, but to be honest, I really just want to
> be able to type either of the following, in the src/interfaces/jdbc directory:
>
> ant jar
> or
> make jar
>
> Both should give the same results. (Its kinda silly that the current technique
> has 'make' call 'ant', but anyways...) The only two issues are multiple build
> tools and ease for building the jdbc driver for non-UNIX users.
>
> And to be more honest, I think we've spent too much time on this as is. If we
> can't decide as a group, we should either a) vote on it (Least the CVS
> committers should) or b) leave it for now. Either way, I'm going to stay out
> of this discussion for now.
>
>
> Virtually,
> Ned Wolpert <ned(dot)wolpert(at)knowledgenet(dot)com>
>
> D08C2F45: 28E7 56CB 58AC C622 5A51 3C42 8B2B 2739 D08C 2F45
-- End of PGP signed section.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026