Re: Bytea string operator support

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Joe Conway <joseph(dot)conway(at)home(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bytea string operator support
Date: 2001-09-14 17:45:19
Message-ID: 200109141745.f8EHjJT28136@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > I agree this is type pollution into libpq but I don't see another option
> > except having the user code this stuff into their application. Maybe we
> > need some type-handling library in the future were we can put all this
> > stuff. Maybe we can add this to libpq now and create a separate library
> > when we need one.
>
> We probably do. After all, the strings you get are not really the most
> optimal form, especially for numbers, dates, and booleans. Looks at the
> JDBC spec, they have getXXX for each data type.

Agreed. Let's add this now and start thinking about developing a
separate lib for 7.3.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-09-14 17:46:37 Re: Bytea string operator support
Previous Message Tomisław Kityński 2001-09-14 15:53:50 isNullable()