Re: multiple inserts

From: Liam Stewart <liams(at)redhat(dot)com>
To: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: multiple inserts
Date: 2001-09-07 15:51:49
Message-ID: 20010907115149.F9712@redhat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 11:28:21AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Liam Stewart <liams(at)redhat(dot)com> writes:
> > But following up on Tom's latest suggestion, I've implemented it in the
> > yacc grammer rather than in the parser.
>
> Oh, that's a cool idea ... I think. Did you take care that coercion of
> values entries still happens correctly? Given the way that UNION type
> resolution is done, UNIONing first and coercing afterwards will not
> produce the behavior we want. An example: suppose f1 is numeric.

Erk.. hmmm..yes, it's busted :( I'll take a look at that.

> This is all pretty ugly in any case :-( ... we're really starting to
> push the limits of what we can accomplish without redoing the Querytree
> datastructure.

Agreed.

Liam

--
Liam Stewart :: Red Hat Canada, Ltd. :: liams(at)redhat(dot)com

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rene Pijlman 2001-09-07 15:56:59 Fix set/get transaction isolation level test in ConnectionTest
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-09-07 15:28:21 Re: multiple inserts