| From: | Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net |
| Cc: | zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: encoding names v2. |
| Date: | 2001-08-23 00:54:53 |
| Message-ID: | 20010823095453L.t-ishii@sra.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
> Okay, here is some bad news: I just looked into the SQL99 standard for
> the names of predefined character set names, and here is the list:
>
> SQL_CHARACTER
> GRAPHIC_IRV or ASCII_GRAPHIC
> LATIN1 <==== !!!
> ISO8BIT or ASCII_FULL
> UTF16
> UTF8
> UCS2
> SQL_TEXT
> SQL_IDENTIFIER
>
> So perhaps we should keep the LATIN1 thing after all? I don't like it,
> but the rules...
>
> Comments?
No way. We always need to follow the standard.
BTW, do you have the SQL99 docs online somewhere? I have a draft, but
it seemss some part of it, especially NCHAR stuffs might be change in
the very last stage...
--
Tatsuo Ishii
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2001-08-23 00:55:06 | Re: encoding names |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-08-22 19:38:03 | Re: encoding names v2. |