Re: Patch list delay

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch list delay
Date: 2001-08-22 23:04:06
Message-ID: 200108222304.f7MN46J07605@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I am getting presistant requests from people asking why their patches
> > haven't appeared on the patches list yet. I have had it happen to me.
>
> I believe part of the problem is that pgsql-patches has the same size
> limit (40K IIRC) as all the other lists for messages to go through
> without approval.
>
> ISTM that for pgsql-patches a larger limit would be appropriate, at
> least a couple hundred K.

Yes. If I am on patches, I expect to receive big files.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-08-22 23:05:07 Re: Re: JDBC changes for 7.2... some questions...
Previous Message Peter Wiley 2001-08-22 22:33:28 Re: Re: JDBC changes for 7.2... some questions...