From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Patch list delay |
Date: | 2001-08-22 23:04:06 |
Message-ID: | 200108222304.f7MN46J07605@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I am getting presistant requests from people asking why their patches
> > haven't appeared on the patches list yet. I have had it happen to me.
>
> I believe part of the problem is that pgsql-patches has the same size
> limit (40K IIRC) as all the other lists for messages to go through
> without approval.
>
> ISTM that for pgsql-patches a larger limit would be appropriate, at
> least a couple hundred K.
Yes. If I am on patches, I expect to receive big files.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-08-22 23:05:07 | Re: Re: JDBC changes for 7.2... some questions... |
Previous Message | Peter Wiley | 2001-08-22 22:33:28 | Re: Re: JDBC changes for 7.2... some questions... |